Recommendation for an Evidence-Based Practice Change PowerPoint Presentation

Purpose
Translating knowledge into practice establishes evidence-based practice (EBP) within the nursing profession. Nurse practitioners participate in the dissemination of research evidence to support the creation of practice interventions. The purpose of this assignment is to prepare students to disseminate evidence to support practice. Students will synthesize the information they have gathered during the course to formulate a presentation advocating for a practice change in relation to an area of interest to NP practice.

Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:

CO1: Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)
CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)
CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)
CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)
CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Due Date: Sun., 11:59pm MT Sunday

Submit your PowerPoint file to the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 7.
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible: 200
Requirements
In Week 7, students will create a PowerPoint slide show with notes pages discussing their PICOT question, literature review, and recommendations for change. In Week 8, students will create a Kaltura recording of the presentation for the Peer Discussion thread.

Criteria for Content
Students will synthesize the information they have gathered during the course to formulate a presentation advocating for a practice change in relation to an area of interest to NP practice.

Creating a Professional PowerPoint Presentation download

In a PowerPoint Presentation, address the following.

Title Slide
Introduction (1 slide): Slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered.
Practice Issue (1-3 slides): Describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem related to NP practice selected in week 2. Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Provide scholarly references to support your ideas.
PICOT Question (1 slide): Provide the PICOT question developed in week 2. Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all the following:
P-Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect?
I–Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply?
C–Comparison – What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions.
O–Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome.
T–Time frame – What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion?
Literature review (2-4 slides):Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.
Recommendations (3 slides):
Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.
Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
Conclusion: (1 slide)Slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic.
References:Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents not required.
Preparing the Presentation
Submission Requirements
Application: Use Microsoft Power Point to create the presentation. Submit as a .ppt or .pptx file.
Length: The PowerPoint presentation should be between 9-13 total slides (excluding title and reference slides).
Speaker notes should be used and include in-text citations when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes.
Submission: Submit the PowerPoint file to the Week 7 Dropbox.
Best Practices in Preparing the Presentation
The following are best practices in preparing this presentation:

Review directions thoroughly.
Follow submission requirements.
Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Review the Creating a Professional Presentation located in Course Resources.
Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly literature.
Abide by Chamberlain University academic integrity policy.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Description

Introduction

(1 slide)

10

5%

Introduction includes concepts to be addressed. Identify sections of the PowerPoint presentation. Speaker notes include details of what will be covered in the presentation.

Nursing Practice Issue/Problem

20

10%

Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing. Explanation of the impact of this issue or concern on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern.

*The nursing practice issue/problem description may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

PICOT question

20

10%

Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as:

P =
I =
C =
O =
T =
PICOT question =
Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements.

*The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

Literature Review

50

25%

Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.

Recommendations Slide 1: Identify EBP change

20

10%

Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

Recommendations Slide 2: Identify key stakeholders

20

10%

Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.

Recommendations Slide 3: Analyze fit, feasibility, and appropriateness

20

10%

Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail.

*Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

Conclusion

(1 slide)

10

5%

Summarize key information presented in PowerPoint presentation. Provide speaker notes.

170

85%

Total CONTENT Points= 170 pts

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Category

Points

%

Description

APA Format

10

5%

Ideas and information that come from scholarly sources must be cited and referenced correctly. In-text and parenthetical citations must be used and may be provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required.

Presentation of Slides

10

5%

PowerPoint presentation includes title slide, 9-13 content slides, and reference slide(s). Presentation of slides is professional in appearance and tone. Balance among space, words and graphics, and color is effective.

Writing Mechanics

10

5%

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current APA manual.

30

15%

Total FORMAT Points= 30 pts

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=200 points

Rubric
NR505NP Week 7 EBP Presentation Rubric
NR505NP Week 7 EBP Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
10 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is concise and includes the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction
9 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is adequate and includes the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction
8 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information includes ONE of the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information is unclear or disorganized and includes one of or both the following elements: • Identification of sections of the presentation • Speaker notes used to add depth to introduction
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No introduction slide
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing Practice Issue/Problem
20 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern
18 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern
17 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing • Provides speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
20 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
18 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
17 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements. *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
50 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented
46 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented
42 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented
25 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Summarize the literature review completed in week . • Discuss themes and special concerns • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Identify EBP Change
20 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
18 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
17 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Key Stakeholders
20 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail
18 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.
17 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Fit, Feasibility, Appropriateness
20 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
18 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
17 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
10 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes
9 pts
Very Good
Presentation of information is adequate and includes the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes
8 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in the following element is missing: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation Provides speaker notes
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Conclusion is not provided
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
10 pts
Excellent
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present
9 pts
Very Good
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present
8 pts
Satisfactory
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 4–5 APA errors are present
5 pts
Needs Improvement
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 6–7 APA errors are present
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 8 or greater APA errors are present
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of Slides
10 pts
Excellent
PowerPoint presentation addresses all of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides
9 pts
Very Good
PowerPoint presentation does not address one of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides
8 pts
Satisfactory
PowerPoint presentation does not address two of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides
5 pts
Needs Improvement
PowerPoint does not address three or more of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
PowerPoint is unprofessional and does not include any elements
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
10 pts
Excellent
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual
9 pts
Very Good
3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual
8 pts
Satisfactory
5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual
5 pts
Needs Improvement
7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
0 pts
0 Points Deducted
0 pts
20 Points Deducted
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Total Points: 200
picot: Does the use of signs and educating nurses and patients about drug usage (I) versus no action (C) prevent medication errors during medical administration (O) among adult in-patients age 65-75 (P) during their hospilization (T)?

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

4-hour deadlines

Your urgent tasks will be completed within 4 hours. Your discussion responses and late orders will be will be handled fast and we still maintain our quality.

Read more
error: