Interprofessional Collaboration Discussion

“Heckman, G., Boscort, V., & Huson, K et al. (2018).Enhancing Knowledge and Interprofessional care for heart Failure ( EKWIP-HF) in long-term care: a pilot study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 4:9”

The article investigates the feasibility, impact, and acceptability of an intervention to improve interprofessional communication and improve heart failure knowledge. The strength of the article is that the study is aimed at developing an effective and sustainable interprofessional heart failure care process in long-term care. The weakness of the article is that it does not determine the effect of the initiative on acute care utilization and long-term care employee job satisfaction. Statistical analysis and results offer preliminary indicate that intervention is acceptable to long-term care staff and also feasible to undertake (Heckman et al, 2018). Interprofessional Collaboration Discussion

ORDER A FREE-PLAGIARISM PAPER NOW
Evidence from the article can be applied in the management of African American males with CHF in primary care clinics. According to Frankstein et al (2015), CHF management is a multidisciplinary task that needs the cooperation of numerous specialists. Whilst there is a collaboration between emergency providers, heart surgeons and cardiologists collaborate in the early stabilization of patients, the engagement of general practitioners and nurses in CHF team might reduce readmission rates and mortality.

“Smeets, M., Roy, S., Aertgeerts, B., Verdandere, M., & Vaes, B. (2016). Improving care for heart failure patients in primary care, GPs’perceptions: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open, 6(11): e013459”

The aim of the article is to investigate perceptions of general practitioners in managing heart failure in primary and facilitators and barriers for best care and notions for improvement. The strength of the article is that the study collected and reviewed the current perceptions of general practitioners in management of CHF in primary care. The weakness of the article is that the study omitted low-quality studies and thus valuable insights from these studies were lost.

Statistical analysis and results indicate it is challenging for general practitioner’s uncertainty on clinical practice, ways of bringing evidence into practice and the way to work jointly as a team of multiple professionals (Smeets et al, 2016). It is feasible to apply evidence from the article in the management of African American males in primary care clinics. Davidson et al (2015) claim that that improved access, quality, equity and efficiency of heart failure care can be attained through the use of multidisciplinary care models if there is fidelity and adherence to elements of heart failure management program. Interprofessional Collaboration Discussion

References

Davidson, P., Newton, P., & Tankumpan, T. (2015). Multidisciplinary management of chronic heart failure: principles and future trends. Clinical Therapeutics, 37(10) 2225-2233.

Frankstein, L., Frohlich, H., & Cleland, J. (2015). Multidisciplinary Approach for Patients Hospitalized with heart Failure. Rev Esp Cardiol, 68(10): 885-891.

Heckman, G., Boscort, V., & Huson, K et al. (2018).Enhancing Knowledge and Interprofessional care for heart Failure ( EKWIP-HF) in long-term care: a pilot study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 4:9.

Smeets, M., Roy, S., Aertgeerts, B., Verdandere, M., & Vaes, B. (2016). Improving care for heart failure patients in primary care, GPs’perceptions: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open, 6(11): e013459. Interprofessional Collaboration Discussion

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

4-hour deadlines

Your urgent tasks will be completed within 4 hours. Your discussion responses and late orders will be will be handled fast and we still maintain our quality.

Read more
error: