Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay

Write a paper of 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) paper for your proposed evidence-based practice project solution. Address the following criteria:

Proposed Solution: (a) Describe the proposed solution (or intervention) for the problem and the way(s) in which it is consistent with current evidence. Heavily reference and provide substantial evidence for your solution or intervention. (b) Consider if the intervention may be unrealistic in your setting, too costly, or there is a lack of appropriate training available to deliver the intervention. If the intervention is unrealistic, you may need to go back and make changes to your PICOT before continuing Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay.
Organization Culture: Explain the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources .
Expected Outcomes: Explain the expected outcomes of the project. The outcomes should flow from the PICOT.
Method to Achieve Outcomes: Develop an outline of how the outcomes will be achieved. List any specific barriers that will need to be assessed and eliminated. Make sure to mention any assumptions or limitations which may need to be addressed.
Outcome Impact: Describe the impact the outcomes will have on one or all of the following indicators: quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and/or professional expertise.
Population Geriatric patients
Intervention Influenza Vaccination
Comparison Receiving influenza vaccine and not receiving the vaccine
Outcome Affect risk of developing Pneumonia during the flu season
Time 10 years

RUBRICS

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section D: Solution Description

 1

Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Solution Description Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay.
100.0 %Describe the proposed solution (or intervention). Explain the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources. Explain the expected outcomes of the project. Develop an outline of how the outcomes will be achieved. List any specific barriers that will need to be assessed and eliminated. Describe the impact the outcomes will have. Proposed solution does not align with or is not supported with research. Alignment is difficult to discern with the organization or community culture and resources. Expected outcomes are ambiguous or missing. Basic outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is missing essential data or incomplete. The impact the outcomes will have is not presented with any type of detail. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Proposed solution is presented but does not include all components. Alignment is difficult to discern with the organization or community culture and resources. Expected outcomes are ambiguous. Basic outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is missing essential data. The impact the outcomes will have may or may not be presented with any type of detail. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay. Proposed solution is presented but needs to be connected to research. Proposed solution alignment with the organization or community culture and resources, is briefly mentioned. Expected outcomes are listed. A basic outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is developed. The impact the outcomes will have is broadly described. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Proposed solution is presented consistent with current evidence and briefly addresses the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources, limited details, and examples. Appropriate conclusions are drawn. The expected outcomes are minimally explained. An outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is developed and broadly describes the impact the outcomes will have. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Proposed solution is presented in detail, consistent with current evidence and is heavily supported by evidence. The ways in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources is explained, and details and examples are provided. Warranted conclusions are drawn. The expected outcomes are explained in-depth. A detailed outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is developed and describes the impact the outcomes will have on one or all of the following indicators (as appropriate): quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and/or professional expertise. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage
Evidence-based project

PICOT question: “Among geriatric patients (P), does the use of influenza vaccine (I) versus not receiving the vaccine (C) reduce the risk of developing pneumonia during the flu season (O) measured over ten years (T)?”

ORDER A PLAGIARISM- FREE PAPER NOW

Proposed solution

Although it is acknowledged that seasonal influenza vaccination is a good strategy for combating seasonal flu among geriatric populations (as presented in Paules et al., 2018), a communication gap exists between the public members and medical personnel that has hindered vaccination efforts. As Schmid et al. (2017) and Kamimura et al. (2017) indicate, there are public misconceptions about influenza vaccines that have hindered their use. Schmid et al. (2017) is succinct in concluding that there are a range of psychological, contextual, socio-demographic and physical barriers that are responsible for public hesitancy in accessing the vaccines. Kamimura et al. (2017) goes a step further in recommending that medical personnel be actively engaged in providing influenza education to the public so as to improve vaccination intensity. The implication is that medical personnel (particularly nurses) should engage in public forums with patients to address their misconceptions with the intention of reducing their hesitancy and increasing their confidence in the vaccine. Given this awareness, the present study proposes that improving vaccine uptake would reduce influenza incidences.

Organization culture

The proposed solution aligns with organization culture and resources since it emphasizes the new care awareness that focuses on prevention as a more convenient, cheaper approach that preemptsthe more expensive and less efficient treatmentapproach. Vaccination is a preventive care approach that protects patients from disease incidence at a cheaper price (when compared to care) while eliminating the hustle and costs associated with disease treatment. Besides that, the proposed solution makes use of the existing immunization systems that include the medical personnel and vaccines to reduce disease incidence(Pokorski, 2018) Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay.

Expected outcomes

The project intends to increase influenza vaccination rates among geriatric populations with the intention of reducing influenza disease incidence. It anticipates that vaccine technology will work as expected by introducing transient immunity into the body so that although the influenza causing pathogens have an opportunity to gain entry into the body, the body’s acquired immunity would be able to halt disease progression. At the conclusion of the study, reduced influenza disease incidence will be reported among immunized persons when compare to their non-immunized counterparts Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay.

Method to achieve outcomes

The expected outcomes would be applied through a retrospective study approach. In this case, the study will rely on medical records covering the influenza season. The focus will be on identifying geriatric patients then determining their influenza vaccination status along with the disease incidence. The intention is to determine if significant trends exist between vaccine uptake and disease incidence (Crewell, 2013).

Outcome impact

The study results are expected to have extensive consequences on medical practice. Firstly, they will improve care quality in terms of ensuring that geriatric patients receive the care that they require. Secondly, it would ensure that patient centered-care is provided by collecting tangible information that would then be presented to patients to allow them make informed choices. Thirdly, it would improve the efficiency of vaccination processes by highlighting their need and importance in improving care outcomes. Thirdly, it aligns with the prevailing environmental changes that highlight the increasing focus on preventive medicine. Finally, it has an effect on professional expertise by increasing the knowledge base of medical personnel and presenting them with evidence that allows them to be more proactive in recommending vaccination as preventive medicine (Pokorski, 2018) Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kamimura, A., Trinh, H., Weaver, S., Chernenko, A., Nourian, M., Assasnik, N. & Nguyen, H. (2017). Knowledge and perceptions of influenza vaccinations among college students in Vietnam and the United States. J Prev Med Public Health, 50(4), 268-273. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.17.061

Paules, C., Sullivan, S., Subbarao, K. &Fauci, A. (2018). Chasing seasonal influenza – the need for a universal influenza vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 378, 7-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1714916

Pokorski, M. (2018). Current concepts in medical research and practice: advances in experimental medicine and biology. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.

Schmid, P., Rauber, D., Betsch, C., Lidolt, G. &Denker, M. (2017). Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior – A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 – 2016. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0170550. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170550 Geriatric Patients Evidence Based Project Essay.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

4-hour deadlines

Your urgent tasks will be completed within 4 hours. Your discussion responses and late orders will be will be handled fast and we still maintain our quality.

Read more
error: