Develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question based on the clinical practice problem discussed in part A and the PICO components identified in part A1.

A. Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient(s) and the organization it affects.

1. Identify the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem:patient/population/problem (P)intervention (I)comparison (C)outcome (O)

2. Develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question based on the clinical practice problem discussed in part A and the PICO components identified in part A1.

Note: Refer to “Appendix B: Question Development Tool” for information on the creation of an EBP question.

B. Select a research-based article that answers your EBP question from part A2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.

1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the research article.

2. Describe the research methodology.

3. Identify the level of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model.


Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.
Note: Refer to “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to level a research-based article.

4. Summarize how the researcher analyzed the data in the article.

5. Summarize the ethical consideration(s) of the research-based article. If none are present, explain why.

6. Identify the quality rating of the research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.

Note: Refer to “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to establish the quality rating.

7. Analyze the results or conclusions of the research-based article and explain how the article helps answer your EBP question.

C. Select a non-research article from a peer-reviewed journal that helps to answer your EBP question from part A2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.

1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the non-research article.

2. Describe the type of evidence (e.g., case study, quality improvement project, clinical practice guideline).

3. Identify the level of evidence using the JHNEBP model.

Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.
Note: Refer to “Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to level the non-research-based article.

4. Identify the quality rating of the non-research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.

5. Discuss how the author’s recommendation(s) in the article helps to answer your EBP question.

D. Recommend a practice change that addresses your EBP question using both the research and non-research articles you selected for Part B and Part C.

1. Explain how you would involve three key stakeholders in supporting the practice change recommendation.

2. Discuss one specific barrier you may encounter when implementing the practice change recommendation.

3. Identify one strategy that could be used to overcome the barrier discussed in part D2.

4. Identify one outcome (the O component in PICO) from your EBP question to measure the recommended practice change.

E. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

RUBRIC

A:CLINICAL PRACTICE PROBLEM

COMPETENT

The submission includes a discussion of the clinical practice problem that logically addresses its impact on the patient(s) and the organization it affects.

A1:PICO COMPONENTS

COMPETENT

The submission includes each of the given PICO components of the clinical practice problem. Each of the given components is accurate and complete.

A2:EVIDENCE-BASED QUESTION

COMPETENT

The submission includes an EBP question that appropriately addresses the clinical practice problem and includes all the PICO components.

B:SELECTION OF A RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The selected article is research based and answers the EBP question from part A2.

B1:BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION OF THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission accurately addresses a discussion of the background or introduction of the research-based article.

B2:RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

COMPETENT

The submission includes a description that accurately describes the research methodology.

B3:LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission accurately identifies a level of evidence that is based on the JHNEBP model.

B4:ANALYSIS OF THE DATA

COMPETENT

The submission includes a summary that accurately describes how the researcher analyzed the data in the article.

B5:ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

COMPETENT

The submission includes a summary that logically describes the ethical consideration(s) of the research-based article. Or, if no ethical considerations are present, the submission includes a logical explanation of why none are present.

B6:QUALITY RATING OF THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission accurately identifies a quality rating according to the JHNEBP model.

B7:RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS OF THE RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission includes an analysis that logically evaluates the results or conclusions of the research-based article and appropriately explains how the results or conclusions helps answer the EBP question.

C:SELECTION OF A NON-RESEARCH-BASED ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The selected article is a non-research article and answers the EBP question from part A2.

C1:BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION OF THE NON-RESEARCH ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission includes a discussion that accurately addresses the background or introduction of the non-research-based article.

C2:TYPE OF EVIDENCE

COMPETENT

The submission includes a description that accurately describes the type of evidence used in the article.

C3:LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN THE NON-RESEARCH ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission accurately identifies the level of evidence according to the JHNEBP model.

C4:QUALITY RATING OF THE NON-RESEARCH ARTICLE

COMPETENT

The submission accurately identifies the quality rating according to the JHNEBP model.

C5:AUTHOR’S RECOMMENDATION

COMPETENT

The submission includes a discussion that logically explains how the author’s recommendation(s) helped answer the EBP question.

D:RECOMMENDED PRACTICE CHANGE

COMPETENT

The submission includes a practice change recommendation that appropriately addresses the EBP question and accurately utilizes both the research and non-research articles to show how the change should be made.

D1:INVOLVEMENT OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS

COMPETENT

The submission includes an explanation of how 3 key stakeholders would appropriately support the practice change recommendation.

D2:BARRIER OF IMPLEMENTING THE PRACTICE CHANGE

COMPETENT

The submission includes a discussion of a specific barrier that might feasibly be encountered during implementation, and the barrier discussed is appropriate for the practice change recommendation.

D3:STRATEGY FOR OVERCOMING THE BARRIER

COMPETENT

The submission identifies a strategy that could logically be used to overcome the barrier discussed in part D2.

D4:OUTCOME TO MEASURE THE RECOMMEND PRACTICE CHANGE

COMPETENT

The submission identifies 1 outcome from the EBP question that appropriately measures the recommended practice change.

E:APA SOURCES

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.

F:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

Appendix B: Question Development Tool

Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool

Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

4-hour deadlines

Your urgent tasks will be completed within 4 hours. Your discussion responses and late orders will be will be handled fast and we still maintain our quality.

Read more
error: